Extended Producer Responsibility
EPR schemes place more responsibility on producers for packaging and waste generated by their products.
The market case for plastic credits, organised around waste management needs, policy and demand for verified outcomes.
Plastic crediting remains a developing market. Its growth case is linked to the need for additional waste-management finance, stronger producer responsibility and demand for independently verified recovery and recycling outcomes.
2005: £4/ton
2025 material: £70–80/ton
Stated growth: 20x
2025 material: £80–150/ton
2035 projection: £400–750/ton
Projected growth: 4–5x
Projected plastic-credit values are forward-looking illustrations only, not guaranteed returns.
Global plastic waste is expected to increase substantially over coming decades. This creates a significant financing challenge for collection, sorting, recycling and responsible waste management infrastructure.
Plastic crediting is still developing, with different standards, project types and approaches across the market. Strong governance, transparent verification and clear claims are important when assessing credit quality.
EPR schemes place more responsibility on producers for packaging and waste generated by their products.
Packaging taxes and levies can encourage greater use of recycled content and changes in packaging design.
Mandatory and voluntary recycling targets can increase the need for measurable recovery and recycling outcomes.
Plastic credits sit within a wider shift towards results-based environmental finance. Their long-term role will depend on market integrity, policy design, buyer demand and the quality of the underlying projects.
SEE HOW INVESTING WORKSRegister your interest and speak with the Reclaim Earth team about the process, market and available opportunities.
REGISTER INTEREST